![]() The author reads the book himself which I found distracting at first. Not much new, but insteresting 1st hand look Scott narrates and does a reasonably good job of telling his "story". ![]() So yes there is enough truth to what Scott has to say to make it a worthwhile read even though he doesn't acknowledge the criminal wrong doings of his bosses. By the way it's the Democrats that destroyed the bipartisan goodwill that existed after 9-11 ( oh please ). ![]() Certainly there is truth to this charge, but again, he fails to acknowledge that it is Karl Rove that promised to create a "permanent Republican majority" or that in the period from 2002-2006 when Republicans controlled both houses of congress and the White House their leadership made "permanent campaign mode" into an art form. In a nut shell, Scott tells us that the problem with the Bush administration is a political culture in Washington that operates in "permanent campaign mode", on both sides of the aisle. No Scott, the word you need to use is lied and Bush did it repeatedly, in every form possible, Scott acknowledges that not only did Bush tell them but that Bush could even come to believe his own lie to himself that he couldn't really remember if he ever used cocaine. ![]() According to Scott, Bush and members of his administration "dissembled". Give Scott credit for trying to write a critical examination of the failed Bush Presidency. ![]() Critical Self Examination Of Bush White House ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |